Saw VI

2009 "The game has come full circle"
6.0| 1h36m| R| en| More Info
Released: 22 October 2009
Producted By: Lionsgate
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http//www.saw6film.com/
Synopsis

Special Agent Strahm is dead, and Detective Hoffman has emerged as the unchallenged successor to Jigsaw's legacy. However, when the FBI draws closer to Hoffman, he is forced to set a game into motion, and Jigsaw's grand scheme is finally understood.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Starz

Director

Producted By

Lionsgate

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 7-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Linkshoch Wonderful Movie
Jeanskynebu the audience applauded
PiraBit if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.
Zlatica One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.
Spikeopath So where were we at now then? Detective Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) is still continuing to do the bloody work of the dead John Kramer/Jigsaw (Tobin Bell). In his sights is William Easton (Peter Outerbridge), an unfeeling insurance head who turned down claims by Kramer and a myriad of others on pathetic technicalities. Cue more elaborate traps, painful decisions and some twisty devilment. Yep! It's another Saw movie.Somewhat surprisingly, part 6 is a step up in quality of writing and ingenuity of gore/trap factors from the previous two installments. It's still very much old hat as a formula, and once again the sequences of Bell used in flashback show him to be the franchise's strength. However, the makers put at the core an insurance issue that everyone can identify with, whilst piling on mystery and suspense by way of Jigsaw's left envelopes and the FBI closing in on an increasingly overt confident Hoffman. 7/10
jacobjohntaylor1 This movie is not scary. There is a short film that the first Saw is based on. Saw the short film is scary. It is 1234564324567754324565435 time better then this crap. Saw (2004) is a better movie and that was awful. Saw II is a better movie and that was awful. Saw III is a better and that was awful. Saw IV is a better movie and that was awful. Saw V is better movie and that was awful. This movie has an awful story line. It is badly edited. There dead bodies it two places at the same time. This movie has an awful ending. Do not see this movie. Do not wast your money. Do not wast your time. This movie is not for people who like real scary movie. It is for people who like to look at a lot of fake blood.
xristoff93 The first one,despite being a low budget movie was quite something.It could have been better but it got me thrilled.After that we get into a loop of decreasing quality,increasing splatter quantity and a seriously flawed plot.Many holes,too many impossible coincidences and too many inconsistensies in a wanna be consistent series of movies.The bad guy breaks his own rules(or his partners),people die whatever choice they make,so there really is no point to watch this so called righteous,yet psychopathic,teaching about appreciating life in the first place.If you like giving more than 5 hours of your life in order to see a plotlles scenario that makes people die in many different ways with a lot of blood and disgust,be my guest...Otherwise I wouldn't recommend it..Watch "seven" with morgan and brad instead or hannibal.I feel guilty even indirectly comparing these awesome movies to this one or the previous ones. Also at many points through all of the movies,except the first,there is a forced timeline manipulation just so the story makes sense....kinda makes sense I mean....Has a chance of making sense..OK it doesn't make much of a sense without tiring you a lot and leaving many holes......
BA_Harrison I found Parts II, III and IV of the Saw series increasingly tedious, so much so that I left it six years before watching Part V. I was pleasantly surprised, then, to (eventually) find that the fifth instalment marked a turning point, the plot-line becoming a bit more interesting with Agent Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) taking on the mantle of Jigsaw, the gore being even more graphic, and the makers clearly taking matters with a welcome pinch of salt (the extreme nature of some of the gruesome traps bordering on self-parody). I was having fun at last.The series continues to improve with Part VI, which develops the Hoffman character further, ladles on even more revolting splatter, and steadfastly refuses to get bogged down with trifling matters such as the cash, time, and skill required to build such amazing methods of torture. Part VI simply gets on with entertaining the fans, with a twisty-turny narrative and bucket-loads of the red stuff.This time around, Jigsaw has assembled a group of despicable life-insurance business-people, and proceeds to teach them that choosing between life and death should not be an easy decision to make. As a result, bodies are blasted, crushed, hung, and, in the film's most revolting scene, melted from the inside with a highly corrosive acid. Meanwhile, the F.B.I. are closing in on Hoffman, although Kramer's wife Jill Tuck (Betsy Russell) also has a surprise in store for the deviant agent. Rather surprisingly, this satisfyingly sick chapter has left me looking forward to more Saw.7.5/10, rounded up to 8 for IMDb.