FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

Tobias Burrows It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

Scarlet The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

Cristal The movie really just wants to entertain people.

adonis98-743-186503 Guerrero returns from the dead once more to protect a stolen relic from getting into the hands of a gang of soldiers, which will ultimately cause hell upon earth. Dead Again in Tombstone is a sequel to the surprisingly watchable 2013 Dead in Tombstone now if the first film was at least fun for some viewers the sequel is a complete waste of time and money. Jake Busey does a horrendous job as the villain, the action is boring and the film tries to be dramatic and fails completely and above all those lesbian scenes and the naked women don't help either trust me. I guess it's my fault that i expected Trejo to make a "good" movie. (0/10)

jedimasterjvr haven't seen the first movie, just started and watched this one, i liked the story and it contained some beautiful shots, a bit too much frog perspective if you ask me. Also i think the pacing of the edit is way too slow!!! which makes the movie boring to watch...next to that, there was a lot of gunfire and not a lot of evading or hiding, combined with bullet impact shots. (then i mean not just people going down, but bullets hitting the wooden stuff)Costuming looked great, and so were the practical effects! Danny Trejo seemed a bit slow in both movement and acting but that might be the edit (not sure).Therefore i rate this movie a 3/10

Wizard-8 I only thought that the original "Dead in Tombstone" was just okay, but I decided to give this sequel a chance, given my love for westerns and for the fact that Danny Trejo was returning. Most likely you'll find this sequel a few notches below whatever you thought of the first movie, as I did. I admit that the movie looks pretty slick for the most part, though some interior scenes are either severely underlit or overlit, and there is some very unconvincing CGI blood and gore. But the script is kind of a mess. There are a number of plot points that are either vague or unexplained at all, and the result is that there is a feeling that the filmmakers were making things up as they went along. The sorry and clumsy script may explain why stars Danny Trejo and Jake Busey seem to be going on autopilot instead of delivering their lines with conviction and true menace. As for the action sequences, it comes across as standard stuff at best, not directed or choreographed in a way that grabs your attention. The movie is not dull, I admit, but all the same it's quite unsatisfying to watch.

Michael Ledo This is the much awaited sequel to "Dead in Tombstone." Oh how do they come with such clever names? If you missed the first film, you can pick up of the gist of it early on. Guerrero (Danny Trejo) is back from the dead, killing for the devil. There is no bike, no flaming skull head, and best of all, no Nicklaus Cage. Colonel Jackson Boomer (Jake Busey) a former Confederate officer leads a band on men into town (which is not Tombstone BTW) wanting to get "the box" that will unleash satanic powers and save his life. He also has the help of the local madam (Elizabeth Lavender).So now we get the backstory, not knowing there was a backstory. It is the same shoot 'em up, slow motion swagger, "I'm not dead yet" type of stuff we see in most action films. Plot is straight forward and kind of makes you wonder which side is the devil on? But Busey explains that in a sober moment.Guide: F-word. Implied sex. Nudity (Elizabeth Lavender, Gwyn Auger +uncredited)