Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Huievest Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

Frances Chung Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

Geraldine The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

cynthiahost This movie displays Drew Barrymore daddy's talent.He was working to be a star of Hollywood motion pictures.Now I don't know who was his mother.Dolores Costello ? The novel writer he was married too.The actress who took advantage of his name and used him? His career as a big star never developed.I don't know why.He plays young man who ran way from his father who had abused him.He took his 7 dollars that the had earned that his abusive father kept holding back.This come from the same company that did the Technicolor ,Trip to the moon, Eagle Lion.They did no use the very cheap Cinecolor that most smaller companies would use just to save pennies,but , expensive bulky Technicolor.Well Cooncat finds himself in some one ranch eating food.He is caught by the ranch Hands.He tries to tell them what happened.But when he tells the story and then he tries to show them the evidence .Strange that it's all the opposite.No one will believe him.Basil Ruysdale plays Davis ,now and older physically handicapped Ranch owner. Lois Butler plays his Older daughter Meagan and Kristine Miller plays Abbey,the youngest.John Archer portrays the next door neighbor rancher Pat.Meagan and Pat are engaged.Pat live in a ranch which was originally owned by the the Davis enemies.In which they had feud ,which resulted in The Davis winning but all their cattle getting killed.Character actor Jack Elam plays Smiling man and Davis Kashner plays Roper.Two of the men that took advantage of Cooncat.Frank Cordell ,i think portrays Frank the alleged store clerk,who tricks Coon into saving his money for him.Stealing it.Frank starts to denies that he has any money of his.Coon tries to get it from him but some one hits him and when he wakes you fines the store clerk dead.So he takes off Rancher Davis decide to keep him for a while to see if his story is true cause they think he mentally ill.Cause the building is abandon.Eventually Abbey believes him when she witness both crooks ,In which the rancher cook ,played by Chill Wills, claim that he saw the same crooks died during the feud.Well during the engagement party .Cooncat and Abey try to look for the crooks ,cause he sees them again.All of a sudden Pats parent are mysteriously murder and Coon is binge blamed and being accuse of being a member of that family.Well Abbey and Coon find the part of the old place where it was sealed off for some evidence.Things are straightened out and everyone believes him.Coon has a girl friend now.this was a very unusual western. 03/5/13

greenheart There were so many westerns made, that it has to have a unique angle or something memorable, to sick its head above the parapet. Did I enjoy this movie? Without a doubt. The characters were strong and likable and I really found myself rooting for the young lad. Location? Excellent. The great expanse of the country was well portrayed and the shacks, houses and barns were all spot on. Acting? Good overall. All utterly believable and gave a strong sense of family unit. Storyline? Well this is maybe where the movie didn't quite do itself justice. The story was okay, but has, with variations, been told hundreds of times and it didn't bring much new to the table. But at 80 minutes, it wasn't too long and I found myself glad to have watched and enjoyed it.

dougdoepke Oddball Western drama. There's no commanding central character to hang your hat on. Barrymore Jr. headlines, but his "Cooncat" stands more for misunderstood youth than as a force for good. Actually, several characters alternate in the spotlight, crippled old Davis (Ruysdael) being the most commanding, with his spirited daughter Abby (Miller) not far behind. Then too, there's a very un-Western hint of the spooky in the "ghost" figures lurking in the background. That "horse dragging" sequence is unusual and more brutal than expected. If Barrymore had padding to ease the abrasion, I couldn't spot it. It's a pretty cluttered screenplay with a number of characters and episodes drifting in and out that makes it difficult at times to keep up with. Nonetheless, it's a good original story with a number of nice touches, including the barn dance; plus, the wide open vistas of southwest Texas (where the epic Giant {1955} was filmed). I also like the way that underneath the sub- plots, the film is really about the hapless kid finding a home. Note that the character Cooncat foreshadows a popular theme of the coming decade—misunderstood youth, especially as popularized by James Dean several years later.I expect the un-tried Barrymore was given top billing for box office purposes. He tries hard, and after all his character is based on anger and frustration since nobody believes him and is about to hang him. The only scene I can spot where he clearly over-acts is when describing the two horsemen to Boatwhistle (Wills). Otherwise, I see him as giving a logically emotional performance. Anyway, I liked the film as an entertainingly offbeat Western.

classicsoncall John Barrymore Jr. brings a Sean Penn-like quality to the portrayal of his character Cooncat in "High Lonesome", although that probably has more to do with his similar looks than in acting ability. This was Barrymore's second appearance in a leading role following "The Sundowners" which came out the same year. In my review of that picture, I opined that it's doubtful daughter Drew ever saw him in that film; my suspicion is that it's probably true here as well.When the picture was all over, I found myself scratching my head. What started out as something of an off-beat mystery Western, this wound up being a story that didn't make much sense. No reason was ever offered as to why the characters of the Smiling Man (Jack Elam) and Roper (Dave Kashner) ever hung around following the murder of Jim Shell in the abandoned trading post. Stealing Cooncat's money was one thing, but why all the other intrigue of lurking in the shadows; the disappearing duo gimmick got a little tired after a while. And what about all the men killed on both sides of the 'Jessup' fence when the Davis crew went out to tear it down? Are we just supposed to forget about all of that like it never happened? And by the way, who killed Pat Farrell's (John Archer) parents? They were dead a whole week before their bodies were discovered, and the idea was that 'maybe' Cooncat was responsible. Well, he wasn't. So who was? Oh, never mind. See what I mean - story elements were brought in and then discarded as if no one was bothering to pay attention.One thing I did like though - this was the only time I've ever seen Jack Elam's lazy eye referenced in a story. As he describes the men who instigated him to go after Jim Shell, Barrymoore's character states - "He had a cast in his eye so you couldn't tell which eye was pointin' where". I just wish they had taken a great line like that and gone somewhere meaningful with it.One last thing in the 'it doesn't make sense' department. Remember the finale? - Smiling Man and Roper have rancher Davis pinned down with gunfire after shooting Cooncat. So what does Davis do? He manages to swing around and just walk into the bad guy cabin through the back door! What??!! How did he do that? I don't know, and you won't either.