Vioundon One hour and a half of nothing
Kien Navarro Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.
Kaydan Christian A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.
Coventry The slight and unidentifiable pain you'll inevitably experience whilst watching "The Killer Eye" is actually caused by your brains as they try to leave the skull through your nose! The human brain can process a whole lot of bad stuff, but sadly nothing is strong enough to tolerate the movie-repertoire of David DeCoteau, especially not this horrible excuse for a horror film. "The Killer Eye" is probably the biggest load of stupid nonsense ever shot on film. Even more so, it's the type of incoherent amateur-crap that seriously makes you wonder why you haven't directed your very own horror movie yet. Surely everyone, even the smallest baby, can do a better job than DeCoteau? He isn't even interested in making a horror movie, anyway. Exactly like in all his other idiotic efforts ("The Brotherhood", "Prison of the Dead"...), he's just looking for an excuse to surround himself with handsome young guys in tight boxer shorts. DeCocteau's fascination with homo eroticism goes beyond being awry, as he even suggests one character to be a 16-year-old male street prostitute. Honestly dude, just quit misleading horror fans and simply dedicate your life to making 100% pure gay porn movies. Everything about this movie is just plain terrible, even the slightest details like for example the DVD cover image. It shows a gigantic eyeball prowling the streets of a big city, but there isn't a single outdoor sequence in the entire movie! All the miserable events take place inside an apartment building inhabited by seven of the most retarded people in the world. The brilliant yet overly obsessive scientist of the bunch is experimenting with the eyes of homeless boys, because he strongly believes that the human eyeball is a gateway to a completely different dimension. The eighth dimension, to be more specific. Without any type of explanation, the study object's eyeball decides to jump out of its socket, takes on enormous proportions and looks for women to have voyeur sex with. The over-sized peeper doesn't do much killing, though. It merely just hypnotizes its victims with rays and penetrates them with its nerves. The characters are empty-headed and ultra-insufferable imbeciles like you've rarely seen any before. Especially the two boxer short-buddies are terrible. They're supposed to be heterosexual studs, but all they do is fondle each other and sleep in the same bed. Their conversations are limited to repeating the line "Dude, you're so fried" countless times, so that gives you an idea of the script's quality. The last 15 or-so minutes are irredeemably awful and insulting, as it seems like the production suddenly ran out of budget and time. Instead of dying slow and painfully, like I hoped, the characters inexplicably vaporize and I'm still not entirely sure how the giant eyeball got defeated. Doesn't matter, just be glad it's over... Avoid this film, like you would avoid being locked up in an elevator with director David DeCoteau.
capkronos Here's another distressingly bad horror/skin flick directed yet again from the prolific and anonymous David DeCoteau (who is hiding under the alias "Richard Chasen" here). David seems to have excellent connections to video chain distributors and late-night cable outlets because his films are much easier to find than your average low-budget flicks. This is not necessarily a good thing.THE KILLER EYE does offer a bare bones plot involving a scientist who accidentally summons up a giant mutant eyeball from the "8th dimension." Unfortunately the monster has little to do other than spy on swingin' sex, a girl taking a shower and two supposedly funny, muscle-bound, drugged out numbskulls who lay around in their underwear watching Linnea Quigley's shower scene in CREEPOZOIDS. The gorgeous Jacqueline Lovell (former adult actress Sara St. James) is the scientist's "neglected" girlfriend, who naturally has to seek sexual fulfillment elsewhere. She and a neighboring woman end up having a "close encounter" with the eye monster, that starts zapping people with a green energy beam during the last five minutes to justify the title. Otherwise it should have been called THE HORNY EYE.So to sum it up, this film has a lame story, the usual assortment of untalented (but attractive) men and women, extreme time padding (slow-mo overdose, repeated shots) and a senseless script that was apparently made up as they went along. Don't bother!
Rattrap007 Ok, where to begin with this film.1. More sex and nudity than a porn film... Ok I never watched a porn film so I'm guessing...2. Horrid acting.... better acting can be seen in middle school plays.3. Dumb plot. Why the 8th dimension? Why not the 5th or 6th?4. The eyeball is a pervert because it is always watching the people naked or having sex.5. Stupid people. Gee you think people would notice a eyeball the size of a very large beach ball, but in this film no one does.
This is a little more than an hour of my life I'll never get back... 0/10.
jake-179 Jeez, I think I am in love with Jacquelline Lovell. Thats a good thing, because I rented her movie, "THE KILLER EYE" and it was SO horrible, she was the only thing worth looking at. Unfortunately, you only get to see a few, sparse, poorly-done soft erotic scenes with her. She has done a lot of movies and even been featured by Playboy, so it is astounding to me that she was connected in anyway with a movie as awful as "THE KILLER EYE." I am an aspiring film maker myself and this movie, "THE KILLER EYE" makes people like wonder, "How is that this movie actually got made, but I am unable to get the funding for the projects I want to do?" Even a beginning film student could make a movie better than "THE KILLER EYE." The lighting was amateurish, the acting was terrible, the effects were poorly done, the writing was bad, the cinematography was really bad (they used slow motion when there was no need at all for it and the shots were poorly set up) and the musical score for the movie was downright annoying. Whoever the guy was with the synthesizer, let me tell you, sometimes less is more. It was very "soap opera like." In other words, cheasey music covering EVERY single frame of film. Hey, if you are John Williams, you can do that and make it work. But if you have a casio keyboard, give it a rest.Here is the thing, though: The premise of the movie, allbeit ridiculous, would actually be cool if they had done it as a comedic short film, a horror movie spoof, almost like a cartoon. And they should have taken a totally over the top approach to it. Lots of lightening strikes at dramatic moments, some classic over acting, especially on the part of the "mad scientist" and the "EYE" should have been a bit more violent, instead of just perverted.I rented this movie because I wanted to give it a chance. I liked the idea, a mad scientist creates a monster in his laboratory. What movie buff wouldn't like that premise? I thought, "Hey, a movie I have never heard of, done on a low budget. Take a break from mainstream Hollywood." But I was let down. Don't make the mistake I made, for your own good avoid this movie. It really STINKS! No offense to Jacquelline, at least she looked great. Even terrible film makers couldn't make her look bad! What a babe.
